? Dibs | Main | Feodor Amirov: Chopin Etudes ?
March 07, 2007
Accept no substitutes
John Lewis writes "No Substitute for Victory", a devastating critique of the neo-Pollyanna-ism I used to espouse in the pages of the Flea. This is the first sensible article I have ever read in an Objectivist publication and, while I continue to find Ayn Rand's devotees as creepy as Scientologists and the like, I am prepared to entertain any argument that is willing to fight. In this fourth great fight our peoples have faced over the last century, what has impeded victory?
The reason for this failure is that every one of the ideas we used to evaluate our options is wrong. In every case, the opposite of today’s “conventional wisdom” is true.
* A strong offense does not create new enemies; it defeats existing foes. Were this not so, we would be fighting German and Japanese suicide bombers today, while North Korea—undefeated by America—would be peaceful, prosperous, and free.
* Poverty is not the “root cause” of wars. If it were, poor Mexicans would be attacking America, not begging for jobs at Wal-Mart.
* Democracy is not a route to freedom—not for the Greeks who voted to kill Socrates, nor for the Romans who acclaimed Caesar, nor for the Germans who elected Hitler.
* A culture of slavery and suicide is not equal to a culture of freedom and prosperity—not for those who value life.
* The world is not a flux of contradictions, in which principles do not work. If it were, gravity would not hold, vaccinations would not work, and one would not have a right to one’s life.
* Being moral does not mean sacrificing for others. It means accepting the American principle of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”—and living for one’s own sake.
History is clear: All-out force against fanatical killers is both practical and moral. It led us to our two most important foreign policy successes—the defeats of Germany and Japan in 1945—and to the permanent peace with those nations that we take for granted today. Such a course was practical and moral then, and it is practical and moral now—an affirmation, and a defense, of life and civilization.
The excerpt will hopefully justify your time in reading the whole thing. It is a clear-headed piece and word perfect until we reach the word "Tehran". That is not the home address of the problem. It seems even the Objectivists are not yet ready to follow their own logic to its conclusion.
In related matters of contemporary policy and the war is John Hawkins' Rightosphere Temperature Check. Pragmatic, altruistic or just obvious: It seems there is a consensus on global warming after all. I want to add two caveats to my participation in the survey: First, I am not American and so it seemed a bit cheeky to be offering an opinion on United States border control policy, and; second, my political views are not conservative, they are reactionary. A Victorian response to the problems of the day is just the tonic for what ails us.
Posted by Ghost of a flea at March 7, 2007 06:47 AM
Comments
Objectivists are as diverse as other libertarians...I have met some who are basically evangelical Christians with Christ replaced by Rands while others are sane rational people able to carry on a conversation in fine rhetorical style.
Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge
at March 8, 2007 05:15 AM
