FleaInNYCbanner.jpg

? John Dee and the Necronomicon | Main | Whale Meat Story ?

November 09, 2005

Cthulhu calling

Book-A-Minute condenses the narrative form of H.P. Lovecraft. It is a wood for the trees problem: correct in the detail but missing of the point. Lovecraft's magical realism is something that emerges from the fissures in his prose.

As a marginally popular writer working in the literary equivalent of the gutter, Lovecraft received no serious attention during his lifetime. But while most 1930s pulp fiction is nearly unreadable today, Lovecraft continues to attract attention. In France and Japan, his tales of cosmic fungi, degenerate cults and seriously bad dreams are recognized as works of bent genius, and the celebrated French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari praise his radical embrace of multiplicity in their magnum opus A Thousand Plateaus.

Posted by Ghost of a flea at November 9, 2005 09:29 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ghostofaflea.com/cgi-bin/mt/trackback-engine.cgi/4831

Comments

Great link, altho I don't think of it as magic realism so much as Gothic pulp. Why aren't there more movies of Lovecraft tales, which ooze with virulent imagery right out of Alien or the Ring. Someone should do The Mountains of Madness, altho it doesn't work as drama, but hey, that's what a good screenwriter is for.

Posted by: beautifulatrocities [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 10, 2005 06:53 PM

Lovecraft stories do not make good movies because the directors tend to go for the horror rather than the menace. The whole point of Lovecraft's stories were the unknowing rather than the knowing. His tales do not really translate well to film and I don't think they ever will.

Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 11, 2005 08:38 AM

It is true there has yet to be a decent film-adaptation of any particular Lovecraft story (though The Dunwich Horror is a camp masterpiece). But I do not believe this means there never will be. John Carpenter's "The Thing", for example, evokes a sense of isolation and mounting horror that is reminiscent of "At the Mountains of Madness". So, for that matter, has the occasional documentary about the Scott expedition. There is no reason in principle a proper adaptation could not be made provided a market could be contrived for one.

Posted by: Ghost of a flea [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 11, 2005 08:58 AM

Mountains of Madness could be brilliant. The story fails as drama because at the key point where the narrator descends into the frozen alien city, Lovecraft uses a clumsy & unbelievable device - the pictographs - to tell a great story about successive alien invasions.

Solution: Before the ship arrives in Antarctica, insert an anthropologist (probably played by Louise Fletcher) who has already broken the hieroglyphic code obtained from fragments found around the rim of the continent, & which are taken as a previously unknown civilization's mythology. Therefore, when they make the discovery of the frozen city, they gradually realize that it is not mythology at all. And not entirely dead...

Posted by: beautifulatrocities [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 11, 2005 02:01 PM

Louise Fletcher is an excellent choice. Or how about Lena Olin...

Posted by: Ghost of a flea [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 11, 2005 04:07 PM

Also good. As long as it's not Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio. It's a brilliant setting, because while the Antarctic coast is starkly beautiful, it's not hard to see something malign in its desolation & isolation

Posted by: beautifulatrocities [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 11, 2005 04:43 PM

I hear that this just-completed independent production of "The Call of Cthulhu" is an excellent film adaptation:

Call of Cthulhu DVD

I'm guessing that the silent film format is a major reason why it succeeds...

Posted by: Varenius [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 12, 2005 02:08 PM