bwfleabanner6a.jpg

September 27, 2004

Reactionary

Confused leftist, Johann Hari interviews ex-socialist Christopher Hitchens. Instead of asking Hitchens to come back to the left, Hari should consider returning to the principles on which progressive politics used to be based (via Daimnation!).

He explains that he believes the moment the left's bankruptcy became clear was on 9/11. "The United States was attacked by theocratic fascists who represents all the most reactionary elements on earth. They stand for liquidating everything the left has fought for: women's rights, democracy? And how did much of the left respond? By affecting a kind of neutrality between America and the theocratic fascists." He cites the cover of one of Tariq Ali's books as the perfect example. It shows Bush and Bin Laden morphed into one on its cover. "It's explicitly saying they are equally bad. However bad the American Empire has been, it is not as bad as this. It is not the Taliban, and anybody - any movement - that cannot see the difference has lost all moral bearings."

And then... It is one thing for George Orwell, brilliant man that he was, to oppose both fascism and Stalinism (and it is telling that Hari should think one of these terms belongs to President Bush at the other end of the seesaw of moral equivalence with the jihadists). But to do so without praising Winston Churchill is nothing to be proud of. Orwell could oppose Hitler and Stalin all he liked but without Churchill such opposition would have left Orwell in flight to the United States or on a short trip to a death camp. Hari despairs at the company Christopher Hitchens keeps. I despair at that element of the left so engrossed in its own rectitude that it can see no difference between elemental evil and the long generations of men who have protected us from it.

Posted by the Flea at September 27, 2004 08:16 AM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?