FleaInNYCbanner.jpg

? White Town: Your Woman | Main | Coffee-punk ?

November 21, 2006

Blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder

Bharatmata.jpg

To a Western eye, the above may look more like a mildly clever editorial cartoon than a gallery piece. Then again we all know what mildly clever editorial cartoons can lead to in these post-Enlightenment days of pandering to the mob. I quite like the implied Indian coastline around Mumbai and think, if anything, this is a flattering rendition of the goddess Saraswati. To a more sensitive eye, however, Bharatmata - "Mother India" - is a provocation, even if it is not clear the artist titled the painting Mother India at all... Queue the gallery burnings, burning in effigy, trashing of houses, one thousand legal suits and, as ever, the death-threats. Flea-readers may be mildly surprised to learn that for once it was not the Amish with the torches and pitchforks but "right wing" Hindu zealots.

Sanatan Sanstha are among the more prominent would be art critics having a go at the work of M.F. Husain; Indian, Muslim and a man with an appreciation for curves. It is all about the denigration, you see. Take the spiritual impact, for starters.

There is an increase in the spiritual impurity (raja-tama) of the surroundings, as a direct result of spiritually distressing vibrations from the denigration (be it objects of denigrating art, discarded packages distorting a Holy symbol, torn Holy symbols used on fire crackers like“Lakshmi bombs”, etc.)

"Lakshmi bombs" may sound promising to some Flea-readers but please think of the vibrations. As Principal Skinner once observed: The shapely female form has no place in the world of art. Those who disregard this handy maxim are liable to end up with an US$11.5m bounty on their head. Hence Husain's decision to take up residence in London his regrettable apology to the mob notwithstanding.

Elsewhere in the Dark Ages Update: Catholic marchers turn on Glastonbury. In this case the religious authorities sided against the mob.

Local pagans were pelted with salt and branded witches who “would burn in hell” during a procession organised by Youth 2000, a conservative Catholic lay group. The Magick Box, a pagan shop on the route of the march, was also singled out and attacked. Maya Pinder, the owner of the shop, said: “We’ve had to hear comments such as ‘burn the witches’, we’ve had salt thrown in our faces and at our shop, people were openly saying they were ‘cleansing Glastonbury of paganism’.

Posted by Ghost of a flea at November 21, 2006 07:27 AM

Comments

Too bad the pagans did not pelt them back shouting "you will sit outside of the doors of the eternal ale house for all eternity". And besides, what are a group of Roman Catholic puritan yobs roaming that shire against the pagans when there are plenty of Anglicans to attack? Turn back the clock to 1520 I say...but not to 1402 - no body wants that.

Posted by: Alan McLeod [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2006 11:22 AM

I notice they decided to throw salt at some of the only people who would not reply with death threats and so forth. As Dark Ages antics go it is a poor showing for the fundamentalists; not only mean-spirited but weak.

Posted by: Ghost of a flea [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2006 11:45 AM

Clearly youth group softies. Have the police Round up the ring leaders and you will have them back to bitching over warm milk before you know it. Better still, make them roll the cheese! Not much canonical cheese rolling out there you know. Not a lot of churchy youth group tar barrel wielding.

Posted by: Alan McLeod [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2006 11:49 AM

I can't imagine what got into them. There are so many people out there who might upset radical sensibilities I cannot see why this particular group should have been troubled by their expression of righteousness.

Posted by: Ghost of a flea [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2006 12:16 PM

Father Kevin Knox-Lecky of St Mary’s church said that after meeting representatives of the pagan community he had decided not to invite Youth 2000 to the town again.

He said: “A family appeared who we don’t know, who were very destructive not only in the town and to the pagan community, but were also swearing at our parishioners as well.”

He said the majority of Catholics taking part in the procession had been well-behaved and respectful of the pagans.

In this case, the acts of violence seem to be an isolated incident, and only a small group was involved. It is encouraging to me that the leaders of the retreat, as well as church leaders in the town spoke out loudly (and immediately) against that sort of behaviour. Interesting, no?

Posted by: Temujin [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2006 11:44 PM

Assuming civilization makes it through the Long War, my hope is we come out the other side cherishing our own particular beliefs and with a rabid insistence that others be left to believe as they will, i.e. with a rabid commitment to the principles of the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of the United States. I think the church and the community acted in an exemplary fashion in this instance which leaves me all the more baffled as to just whom these "youths" thought they were going to impress with their behaviour.

Posted by: Ghost of a flea [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 22, 2006 04:42 AM

I would have replied: "So is child molesting a requirement of the Priesthood or just a perk?"

Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 22, 2006 05:35 AM

“… I quite like the implied Indian coastline around Mumbai…”

A breast man, I take it?

A few years back, Nahguib Mahfouz, the only Arab to win the Nobel Prize, was attacked and seriously injured by a knife-wielding bunch of the usual suspects (Mahfouz was 82 at the time). He said something to the effect that “what really hurts is that they hadn’t even read any of my books.” I’m betting the same applies to this pack of Hindu art critics; they haven’t seen the paintings, but they know what they don’t like. The impulse to prove we’re the good guys by stomping the crap out of the unbelievers is universal. The nastiest examples right now are associated with a particular religion, but that doesn’t make this other stuff any more admirable.

How many devout Catholics are there in Glastonbury, anyway? I had the impression you could sign up every believing Christian in Britain for a Carnival Cruise and still have empty berths.


Posted by: utron [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 22, 2006 10:40 AM

Gahh. Nobel Prize for Literature, obviously. Wouldn't want to forget Yasser Arafat or, less grotesquely, Anwar Sadat.

Posted by: utron [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 22, 2006 10:43 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in. Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?