? Film festival | Main | Blogged nations ?
September 16, 2003
Irshad Manji
Irshad Manji is a super-perky presence at the more worthy end of the spectrum of Canadian cable broadcasters. She tends to cultural and lifestyle reporting in the urban hipster vein. Her spiky hair, funky glasses and even-handed approach to issues makes her own opinions clear while taking care to respect those of others (which is more than can be said of my ire for the film festival). I fully expect to see her in a prominent anchor-type role at the CBC or leading column at the Globe and Mail in the next few years.
That is assuming we Lilliputians of the blogosphere fail to bring down the CBC giant and, naturally, that we all live to see the day. Manji's new book, The Trouble With Islam could be an inspiration to us all:
Ms. Manji said her book denounces terrorism, the poor treatment of women and ''Jew-bashing'' while promoting tolerance and human rights. In it, she urges an Islamic reformation that begins in the West. ''I didn't write this book to be deliberately inflammatory,'' said Ms. Manji, a self-described activist, leftist, Muslim and feminist. ''It's about the things that were troubling to me as a kid and the things that are troubling young Muslims today.''
This National Post article directs readers to the book's website and draws attention to two comments.
One e-mail calls the author a ''pro-Zionism parasite ... trying too hard to back-stab your fellow brothers and sisters.'' Another warns: ''You will sooner or later pay for your pack of lies.''
I hope Manji receives a better reception from other people who describe themselves variously as leftists, activists, Muslims and feminists. It is a bizarro-world politics where the National Post scoops the so-called "alternative" press or the bastions of Canada's establishment Liberal media in promoting Manji's work. Canadians are smug points to a parallel phenomenon of support for Coalition forces among young Iraqi women. More than a few of the blogs supporting Blog Iran! might be described as conservative, right-libertarian or just plain right wing. The view from the Flea is a world where the forces of radical democracy, women's emancipation and freedom of conscience and religion are being advanced on the right. It is time for a war on the triple-thesis of perversity, futility and jeopardy!
Which is sort of too bad because "Perversity! Futility! Jeopardy!" would make a great battle-cry.
And then... This Globe and Mail article quotes Manji placing her writing within the tradition of ijtihad:
"I'm not asking Muslims to do something outside of our tradition," she insists. "Just the opposite: I'm trying to help revive ijtihad, Islam's lost tradition of independent thinking. And this opportunity to rediscover ijtihad is especially available to Muslims in the West, because it's here that we already enjoy precious freedoms to challenge and be challenged, without fear of state reprisal. What I'm trying to do is promote tolerance. To get there, I and a critical mass of my fellow Muslims need to confront the intolerance that's percolating in our own ranks."
Imagine, if you will, a self-described feminist, activist, leftist Christian woman receiving death-threats from "fundamentalist" "Christians" in response to her writing. Imagine further that these hypothetical writings opposed discrimination and hatred directed toward women, gay men and religious minorities and it was precisely for advocating these positions that she risked death. The Left would be up in arms and quite right too. And yet there is no change of subject to which some will not resort in order to avoid condemning those who would threaten Manji for advancing her opinions. I can only conclude that many of those who criticize Manji likely agree with the people who would harm her.
So listen to this. If you do not like independent women, shrug your shoulders to hear of gay men being beheaded and think it is fine to threaten people with death for holding religious views different than your own then you should be ashamed of yourself. You are not welcome on my blog and I will not publish your opinions in my comments section.
The article continues:
Despite the undeniable risks, Manji is intrepid, if not fearless. "It may sound corny to a non-immigrant," she said over coffee one morning last week, "but we immigrants totally understand that what we have here in the West is precious. And I don't mean material goods -- I mean freedom. There is something I've got here as a Muslim woman that I probably couldn't expect in too many other places. I've been using it since I was a kid and damn it, I'm not going to stop now. I have a very thick skin, a pretty big brain and, I will be the first to admit, an even bigger mouth. I don't pretend to have all the answers. But thank God, yours and mine, that in this part of the world it is not only a right to ask questions -- it is right to ask questions."
And then... Classical Values has more including a link to an interview Manji gave to Macleans.
There is a sterling opportunity now to begin eating away at the oppression that dictators -- but also Islamic dictators -- have imposed on people in this part of the world. I asked so-called anti-war activists in the lead-up to the Iraqi invasion, "If not military action, then what?" Nobody had an answer for me. Instead, they had epithets and they had slogans. Sorry, that's not thinking. How do brutalized people manage to overthrow their own dictator if not with outside help?
Posted by Ghost of a flea at September 16, 2003 07:59 AM
Comments
I am also looking forward to her book. But let's not pretend that Manji was anything but an element of the most obnoxious part of the Canadian leftist establishment. Condescending and patronizing, all the way.
As for the right half of the blog-world, I find it is too often infested with LGF-quoting bigots. I do see great potential in the right-wing-blogosphere, but it needs to clean up its act first. We need a blog-conservatism free of bigotry.
Posted by: Ikram Saeed at September 16, 2003 11:18 AM
Non-bigotry all round!
Let's so I am optimistic about Manji's book while accepting that "condescending and patronizing" are almost inevitable when we are talking about the well-meaning Canadian establishment.
I use lgf as a resource all the time and am happy to be numbered among the non-idiotarians listed there. There is plenty of intemperate language in the comments and that fire is directed at all sides. I suppose the hope I feel for Manji's book is the possibility of conversation directed to specific policies and specific issues rather than the generalized finger-pointing to which debate often descends.
Posted by: Nicholas Packwood at September 16, 2003 12:53 PM
Nick -- I've also spent some time on LGF. It is the most popular hate-blog on the net, and being on its blogroll should really be a mark of shame, not pride. If you really are interested, I can pull out some of the stuff said in the comments section to ilusrate what the blog is about. Thoguh i'm sure you are aware of the stuff said there.
The blog goes far beyong intemperate language. and by no means is the hate directed at all sides (not that it would be aceptable even if it did have a wide variety of bigots, not just one type).
I've been told that LGF was not always a cesspool of hate. Perhaps. But that's what it is now. And there is nothing edifying about participating (or endorsing) such a group.
Posted by: Ikram Saeed at September 16, 2003 02:51 PM
Mr. Saeed,
I'm not certain it's entirely fair to judge a blog by the content of the commenters. Let's be a little more fair and judge it by the actual posts of the authors. I read LGF fairly frequently and I do not see any evidence of snicere hate-mongering by Charles and LGF. I do see that Charles is particularly fed up with the major media giving Palestinians a free ride, while working Israel over pretty hard. I think he's also a little ticked that other moderate Muslims have not done a terrific amount of self-policing; discrediting those (like Osama) who twist Islam into a vengeful violent force. This is the sort of thing that happens all the time when a so-called Christian bombs an abortion clinic; the ones who call these terror attacks a step forward for the unborn are roundly criticized. I think LGF would be happy if the Middle East started doing some of the same.
It's also not hard to spot some "intemperate remarks" as Nick puts it, in the comments. This doesn't lead me to believe that all LGF readers are foaming at the mouth and lurking on street corners with crowbars to waylay Muslim women and children. The commenters are usually harsh critics of the United States, Canada, and Israel, when warranted, not just Arab or Muslim states.
Perhaps you've had a bad experience there, and this may help persuade you that they are all bigots. Keep in mind that there are rotten apples in every bunch, but that does not mean that the entire franchise can be painted with such a broadly irredeemable brush.
Posted by: Chris Taylor at September 16, 2003 03:38 PM
I wrote a post intending to congratulate Manji for taking a position as leftist, activist, feminist Muslim woman who has reportedly written from a perspective all too infrequently heard at the very real possibility of risk to herself. The only "shame" connected to my post is that she should have received threats for expressing her opinions. I have not read her book and so can only comment on what I have seen from the related website and express a hope for the possibility of a debate which includes the liberation of women everywhere and an end to the vile anti-semitism which has reared its head in so many corners. I further pointed to a peculiar state of affairs where the advocates of democracy, freedom of conscience and personal liberty are often heard in places I would never have expected until recently. Am I skeptical about the intentions and motivations of many elected officials in the West? Absolutely. That is a list which starts with the government of Canada. But nothing I had to say and nothing Manji faces has anything to do with anonymous comments left on another blog.
Posted by: Nicholas Packwood at September 16, 2003 08:37 PM
One of these days I might write a post about my editorial policy here. I delete comments which use foul language or which I regard as abusive or insulting to other commenters or myself. I also delete comments I find offensive. In fact, I just deleted a comment someone left with regard to gay marriage for no other reason than I disagreed with it. Why? I publish this thing and I pay for it. This is not a public forum. I have no interest in paying to publish viewpoints with which I disagree unless I find them entertaining, educational or otherwise thought-provoking.
Posted by: Nicholas Packwood at September 16, 2003 08:47 PM
What's unque about Manji is that what she says should be self-evident. Women should have equal rights to men. Homosexuals exist (loved the story on her web site about the reaction to her show on gay Muslims) and should have rights. Criticizing Israel is OK, but rabid anti-Semitism is not. Slavery is not nice. Tolerance is good.
The fact that saying these things out loud is seen as a betrayal and a threat is scary.
Posted by: angua at September 16, 2003 09:57 PM
Ikram,
We need a blog-world free of bigotry. In fact, I don't think the lack of bigotry should be limited to the blog-world.
Posted by: angua at September 16, 2003 10:00 PM
Chris -- As Nick points out, a blogger controls his own comments. On my blog, I enjoy reading comments that disagree with me, but I delete comments I find unacceptable. Charles Johnson's comments indicate the range of view he finds acceptable.
Angua -- I agree. But the blog world (this corner of it) is one of my worlds, and i care more about the worlds I occupy. I will also be voting against the white-supremicist running for mayor of Ottawa. Let's focus on keeping our own worlds clean.
And out of defernece to Nick, who does not appreciate the way this thread has drifted, I'll refrain from commenting further on this issue here.
Posted by: Ikram Saeed at September 20, 2003 03:31 PM
Thanks, Ikram, Chris and Angua for your courteous exchange of views. This post has moved further up the Google search hierarchy than I might have expected and I am closing comments to it now.
Posted by: Nicholas Packwood at September 22, 2003 11:51 AM
